His remarks about economic growth are no exception. Sanders, I-Vt., a democratic socialist, has a long track record of staking out positions beyond the scope of the normal Democratic agreement. Deodorant isn’t starving America’s children” - accused him of implying “some kind of a national trade-off between antiperspirant/Air Jordan variety and food for children.” But the reference to deodorant in Sanders’ original remarks was just a throwaway line, tossed off while he was making a much broader point about the nature of economic growth. Washington Post economics writer Jim Tankersley - in a piece titled “ Sorry, Bernie Sanders. Observers at both conservative publications and more centrist outlets reacted with incredulity. “All right? You don’t necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants or of 18 different pairs of sneakers when children are hungry in this country.” You can’t just continue growth for the sake of growth in a world in which we are struggling with climate change and all kinds of environmental problems,” he told CNBC’s John Harwood. “The whole size of the economy and the GDP doesn’t matter if people continue to work longer hours for low wages and you have 45 million people living in poverty. On Tuesday morning, the same day Sanders formally announced his entrance into the 2016 Democratic primary race, CNBC ran an interview with the long-shot candidate in which he suggested he would be willing to accept less consumer choice when it comes to such items as deodorants in exchange for less child poverty. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign has barely broken sweat, but already some commentators appear interested less in the candidate’s policies than in his views on deodorant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |